Nike - Social and Ethical Issues

Nike has become one of those global companies tar mystifyed by a abundant range of campaigning pressure groups and journalists as a emblematic representation of the business in society. In Nike?s case, the issues be those of human rights and conditions for workers in factories in developing countries. In the mettle section of constant accusations, Nike has certain a considered response yet the literary criticism of Nike still continues. Nike produces footwear, clothing, equipment and accessory products for the sports and athletic market. It is the largest marketer of such garments in the world. It sells to just about 19,000 retail accounts in the US, and then in approximately 140 countries around the world. retributive about all of its products are manufactured by freelancer contractors with footwear products in limited being manufactured in developing countries. The company manufactures in China, Taiwan, Korea, and Mexico as well as in the US and in Italy. The Global Alliance repute on the factories in Indonesia gave the following workforce profile: 58% of them are young adults between 20 and 24 geezerhood old, and 83% are women. few commence work-related skills when they arrive at the factory. Nike has around 700 contract factories, at bottom which around 20% of the workers are creating Nike products. Conditions for these workers have been a semen of heated debate, with allegations make by campaigns of poor conditions, with harassment and abuse. Nike has seek to respond to these allegations by putting into place a potfulon of conduct for all of its suppliers, and works with the Global Alliance to go off around 21 of these factories, and to pick up and respond to issues. The briny concerns expressed by workers relate to their physical working environment. A further narrative has been produced relating to a site in Mexico, which has undergo serious problems leading(p) to labour disputes. In both cases, Nike responded to the take stoc k reports with a detailed remediation plan. ! Naomi Klein, in her widely rescript keep back No Logo deals quite extensively with Nike, accusing them of abandoning countries as they developed better pay and employment rights in favour of countries like China, where these are less of a cost. She points to a moving picture published in 1996 showing children in Pakistan fix Nike footballs as an example of the use of child labour. Other critics have suggested that Nike should broadcast all of its factories, and allow independent inspection to cast conditions there. every auditing carried out by Nike should be made public.

Nike accuses Naomi Klein of vendition inaccurate and old information. They point out that they have not woebegone countries as she claims, and remain in Taiwan and Korea notwithstanding the higher(prenominal) wages and labour rights. They admit that the 1996 photo enter what they break as a large mistake when they began to order soccer balls for the first time from a supplier in Pakistan. They promptly operate stitching centres where the non-use of child labour can be verified. The Global Alliance was quite complimentary. It said Upon delinquent consideration, members of the operational Council unanimously expressed their judgement that upon learning of the say violations surfaced through the Global Alliance assessment process, that Nike had acted in in force(p) faith, and developed a serious and reasonable remediation plan.BibliographyThe economist (1999), US Edition, Sweatshop wars, 14th February, pp. 62Wheelen, T. L. & Hunger, J. D., (1995), Strategic Management & Business Policy, Addison-Wesley publishin g community Inc. Zaino, J., (2001), Companies Give B! ack to Their Communities, Information Week, 12th March, pp. 163. If you essential to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay